The cost of a wide recall
A recall priced by uncertainty is expensive. Without a clear link from the suspect lot to the exact vehicles that received it, the safe choice is to recall everything that might be affected, parts, labour, and reputation, far beyond the units actually at fault.
Genealogy captured at the station, not reconstructed later
The control is forward and backward traceability built as the part is made: which lot, which torque value, which operator, which sub-supplier batch, recorded at each step.
IATF 16949, the automotive quality standard, extends ISO 9001 traceability for exactly this, so containment can be surgical rather than blanket.
Why it belongs in one system
Traceability, supplier scorecards, and nonconformance workflows fail audits when they live in scattered spreadsheets. On Hudace they share one record, and Xenon AI watches for drift, a torque trend, a supplier defect rate creeping up, before it becomes a containment event.
A person signs off the action; the trail is audit-ready without a scramble.
The numbers to watch
Tie the programme to the scorecard measures your OEM customers already hold you to.
PPM defect rate
Parts per million nonconforming. The headline quality number on every OEM supplier scorecard.
First time quality
Share of units built right with no rework. Rising FTQ means fewer escapes to contain.
Warranty cost ratio
Warranty claims as a share of revenue. The downstream cost traceability is built to shrink.
Containment ratio
Affected units / units recalled. The closer to one, the more surgical the recall.
See live traceability on Hudace
Talk to our team about genealogy, supplier scorecards, and quality on one AI-native platform.